facebook google twitter tumblr instagram linkedin
Powered by Blogger.
  • Home
  • About My Books

A Thousand Worlds

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_nPTY-gmYGgR-TORlkx8UyUG4zKW6oEFivCzqBBz3-Y/edit?usp=sharing

Enjoy! Sorry about the extra page, but I don't know how to get rid of it!
1:19 PM No comments
I noticed something very interesting in Evicted. Matthew Desmond never attempts to make Sherrena, Tobin, or Quentin look like villains. That could have been very easy, especially since Desmond spent time living in their property and had a landlord-tenant connection with them. He could have written them as awful people who just looked for money. That wasn’t all he made them out to be.
The book opens with Arleen renting an apartment from Sherrena. When they meet for the first time in the book, Desmond writes, “There was a knock at the door. It was the landlord, Sherrena Tarver. Sherrena… was loaded down with groceries. She had spent $40 of her own money and picked up the rest at a food pantry. She knew Arleen needed it” (3). This is the first time we meet Sherrena, and her first action is a kind one. She offers help to her new tenant without requiring payment. It’s out of the goodness of her heart. Had Desmond wanted us to dislike Sherrena, he could have chosen not to put that scene in the prologue. It could have just focused on the awful shape the apartment was in and how expensive it was. He does, of course, touch on these things, but not with the intent of making Sherrena look bad. Just to highlight the terrible conditions Arleen and her children would have to live under.
We begin hearing less and less about Sherrena, Quentin, and Tobin in the second half of the story. This is most likely because the tenants begin to spread out as they get evicted and Desmond follows them. But, in the time we are with them, they aren’t the antagonist. It’s made quite clear that the system is the true villain in this story. The landlords, like the tenants, do everything they can to provide for their families. Every character is best described as morally gray. I think it’s nice that Desmond doesn’t attempt to antagonize anyone. He doesn’t give the people a scapegoat. For it’s the housing system and the government who has failed, not the people.
9:59 AM No comments
Image result for american prison tumblr
Vanetta Evans broke my heart.
I briefly mentioned her in my last microblog. I was using her to prove a point, so I couldn’t get too deep into her life story, but she really deserves a full-length telling of her tale.
Vanetta Evans is 20 years old and, when we first meet her, is staying in the Lodge, a homeless shelter, with Crystal Mayberry. She is a mother of three young children. The oldest is Kendal Jr. He is four years old, but he’s very mature for his age. He has to be for his mother. She had him when she was sixteen. A year later she had Tembi, her daughter, and another year later she had Bo-Bo, a son. When a daycare worker dropped Bo-Bo on his head, he began having seizures. Every time he has one, Vanetta rushes him to the hospital. Her boyfriend at the time was abusive and provided nothing. Well, he did once.
Vanetta’s hours at Old Country Buffet were cut from five days a week to one. She couldn’t afford to pay her electricity bill and was about to get her lights shut off. She had no way to pay to keep her electricity and the rent. With the threat of losing her apartment and her children to Child Protective Services looming over her shoulder, she felt helpless. To “help”, her friends suggested that they rob two women they saw walking by. Her boyfriend gave her friend a gun and Vanetta took the purses. The cops caught them, Vanetta was fired and evicted, and she took her kids to the Lodge.
The main reason I wanted to talk about Vanetta was that of her sentencing hearing. The judge says there’s nothing stopping her from committing a crime like that again, so they can’t take any chances. I didn’t care too much about what the judge was literally saying. What Desmond writes next, however, was heartbreaking to me. He writes: “What the judge was saying, in essence, was: We all agree that you were poor and scared when you did this violent, hurtful thing, and if you had been allowed to go on working five days a week at Old Country Buffet, refilling soup pots and mopping up frozen yogurt spills, none of us would be here right now. You might have been able to save enough to move to an apartment that was de-leaded and clean in a neighborhood without drug dealers and with safe schools. With time, you may have been able to get Bo-Bo the medical treatment he needs for his seizures, and maybe you could have even started taking night classes to become a nurse, like you always wanted. And who knows, maybe you could have actually become a nurse, a real nurse with a uniform and everything. Then you could really give your kids a childhood that would look nothing like the one Shortcake gave you. If you did that, you would walk around this cold city with your head held high, and maybe you would eventually come to feel that you were worth something and deserving of a man who could support you other than by lending you his pistol for a stickup or at least one who didn’t break down your door and beat you in front of your children. Maybe you would meet someone with a steady job and get married in a small church with Kendal standing proudly up front by the groom and Tembi as the poofy-dressed flower girl and Bo-Bo as the grinning, toddling ring bearer, just like you always dreamed it, and from that day on your groom would introduce you as “my wife.” But that’s not what happened. What happened was your hours were cut, and your electricity was about to be shut off, and you and your children were about to be thrown out of your home, and you snatched someone’s purse as your friend pointed a gun at her face. And if it was poverty that caused this crime, who’s to say you won’t do it again? Because you were poor then and you are poor now. We all see the underlying cause, we see it every day in this court, but the justice system is no charity, no jobs program, no Housing Authority. If we cannot pull the weed up from the roots, then at least we can cut it low at the stem” (Desmond 267). Vanetta knew what she could have been worth. Could things have come in the way of this dream? Absolutely. Even if she had kept her hours, several things could have happened to change the course of her life. Yet this life was a possibility. The only thing in the way of it was her boss. By cutting her hours, they cut away her stability, her self-confidence, and her chance at a steady future. She lost a life for herself, her children, and her grandchildren after that. It wasn’t the crime that took this away from her. However, the crime did take something. She is sentenced to 81 months in the prison system for emptying those two purses. 15 months in the prison, 66 months under supervision. Kendal, expressionless, watches her leave in handcuffs. He stays strong for his mother for the last time for over a year to come.
Vanetta committed a crime. That much I can say. I can’t say that she wasn’t a victim. With three children crammed into a tiny, filthy apartment, electricity about to be cut, and the threat of eviction, she was desperate. Desperation leads to dangerous things. She made a bad choice, but it wasn’t a “rich kid getting drunk and running people over” bad choice. And, unlike that rich kid, she got prison time for her decision. Vanetta lost everything. She certainly lost more than the women she robbed. She’s out of prison by now, seeing as this book was published in 2016, but she still has to get another job, find a house, take GED classes, and take care of her children. She’s not confined, but she’s trapped.
Anyone who says that America provides her with limitless options is lying.
Anyone who says she is free is lying.
And anyone who says she is lucky to live where she lives is lying.
1:48 PM No comments
This final half of Evicted was primarily focused on children.
The whole book was wrapping up. We got to see some recovery stories (Scott moving into his own apartment and staying off heroin), some “recovery” stories (Crystal losing her house and her monthly SSI checks but becoming a prostitute and savoring her religion even more), and some really tragic endings. The thing is, there was only one good ending that involved children. The Hinkinstons moved into a house in Brownsville, Tennessee after the birth of Malik Jr. Every other family with kids gets a terrible end.
Arleen, one of the first tenants we meet in the story, has many children (shown in my first nonfiction microblog). When I made that character map, I noted in my written explanation that she only interacted with two of her children in the story. Since then, I’ve learned that the rest of her children were taken by Child Protective Services and placed with other families. In this half of the story, she interacts with Boosie, another one of her children. He and Jori do have a sibling dynamic, but it’s clear that they don’t see each other often. The children that Arleen still has custody of, Jori and Jafaris, are taken by Child Protective Services in this half as well. They come back once Arleen gathers the money to put electricity back in her apartment.
Another mother in this story is Pam Reinke. This half really highlights how racism affects her life. People with terrible lives always want someone to hate and blame for their problems. Pam and Ned (especially Ned) blame people of color. Unfortunately for them, they’re looking for an affordable living space for them and their 4 ½ children. They can’t afford to pick and choose how white their neighborhood is. They still try. Eventually, they get one, but Pam is unhappy. Ned treats her and her children, especially her mixed children, horribly. Pam is still racist but she’s a mother first. She feels like a failure of a mother for letting her children be called awful things. Yet, she believes she’s tied to Ned. She needs the income and can’t leave him. She tells the girls “that Ned is the devil” with the hope that they won’t listen to him (Desmond 239). We’ll never know if it’s enough.
Vanetta Evans is a new character in this half and a mother of three. She lives with Crystal. We don’t see a lot of her in the book, so I don’t have a lot to write here, but where she ends up is pretty tragic. At a low point in her life, she went out with some friends. Her friends decided to rob some women and tasked Vanetta with taking the bags. Vanetta, confused and scared, agreed. Her story ends with her going on trial and being sentenced to nearly 7 years in prison in front of her children. It’s a short, sad story.

Once the cycle of poverty begins, it’s incredibly hard to get out of it. It’s hardest for women who, more often than not, are mothers. All of these women were teen mothers. According to the Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy, 59% of teen mothers never complete high school. When a teenage mother is impoverished, she raises her children in poverty. Typically, her children will never get what they need. This can lead to several problems from depression to malnutrition to simple lack of education. According to Committee on Adolescence and Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care, the child also has a 25% chance of becoming an adolescent parent in turn. Not only do these teen mothers go on to live awful lives, but they set up awful lives for their children.
Children are the future. This is said over and over again. However, looking at the lives of Arleen, Pam, and Vanetta, there are certain children who are not being taken care of. Teen mothers and their children in turn are leaving school and leading lives that will only continue the cycle of poverty.
That doesn't sound like a real future. Not to me.
10:19 AM No comments
In Evicted there are small numbers on the end of certain phrases. Usually, these are quotes or statistics. These little numbers lead to a section called "Notes" in the back of the book. A small note corresponds to each number. I'm sure there's a better term for the system I just described, but that's all I've got. Anyway, I used to pay these no mind. They were annoying at most. As for how I felt about what else Matthew Desmond had to say, well...
Image result for i don't careWhen I picked the book up again, however, I started leafing through the "Notes" section to find the corresponding entry. I've been pleasantly surprised. The entries range from sources to commentary on statements made by the people in the book. I don't care much for the sources, but the commentary is... actually intriguing! It gives genuine insight on issues that the story doesn't have the space for. Also, most of the people contributing to these issues in the stories either don't care or don't realize.
I've decided that I like hearing what else Desmond has to say. It's important to my understanding. Is it fun having to search for the right notation? Absolutely not. It impacts how I see homelessness and the several issues that go with it, though. So maybe it's not supposed to be fun.
5:48 PM No comments



1:25 PM No comments
I have a lot of feelings about Lenina Crowne.
To start, I don't like her in the slightest. She is annoying, entitled, and the embodiment of high society. She sees herself as essentially nothing and yet everything at the same time. She could be in a Leia-style gold bikini smelling like a flower dipped in ecstasy and ask why the savages were so primitive. I hate her. However, I really pity her character. Lenina was brought up in a world without love. That’s sad enough, but nearly every character in this book was raised without love, so that isn’t my sole reason for pitying her. I pity her because she falls in love herself and doesn’t know it.
Image result for i wont say im in love gif
I swear I’m not a romantic person. At least, not really. But even I can comprehend that John and Lenina’s relationship was tragic in every sense of the word. For John, who has only ever read Shakespearean romance, this is love at first sight. This beautiful white woman comes to his village on vacation. I don’t like the fact that her whiteness is made a trait that makes her more beautiful than the other girls, but it’s right there on page 78. To him, she is unique in all the world. He pretty much sees himself as Romeo. He had his heart broken by Kiakimé (Rosaline) and found Lenina in her place, his Juliet.
Personally, I hate that story, but I wasn’t raised on Shakespeare and tears. Moving on.
This meeting wasn’t very special for Lenina. This is how she reacts to seeing him the first time: “Lenina was smiling at him; such a nice-looking boy, she was thinking, and a really beautiful body” (Huxley 78). She experiences physical attraction similar to his, seeing as he, too, is white and handsome. But for her, who has never heard of love or marriage, he is just another attractive man to bed.
John wants to remain chaste until marriage like the goody two-shoes he is. I’m not knocking him for wanting that, but he is a goody two-shoes. Lenina, as we know, is the opposite of chaste and wants to have sex with John ASAP. Naturally, tensions rise and John is having a bad time. When Lenina undresses in front of him and throws herself at him when he says he wants to marry her, the bomb goes off. John calls her a whore and says he never wants to see her again.
And Lenina will never understand why this boy left her.
I will not say Lenina was entirely innocent. She made a lot of bad decisions, including misinterpreting and basically ignoring the idea of consent from John. But that is who she was trained to be. She’s practically a sex doll because that’s what society demands of her. In fact, she is constantly described as “pneumatic”, which means “full of air”. John wants a real relationship with emotions and a bond that can suffer and still remain strong. When Lenina is faced with suffering, she takes some soma and leaves.
To make matters worse, it doesn’t end with their fight.
The book ends with John attempting to live his life in solitude, paying for his sins (aka his sexual desire for Lenina). A man films him whipping himself and makes a 4D movie out of it, making John a sensation. A horde of people appear at his door and scream for the whip. In that horde is Lenina. She isn’t screaming with the rest of them. She “pressed both hands to her left side, and on that peach-bright, doll-beautiful face of hers appeared a strangely incongruous expression of yearning distress. Her blue eyes seemed to grow larger, brighter; and suddenly two tears rolled down her cheeks. Inaudibly, she spoke again; then, with a quick, impassioned gesture stretched out her arms towards the Savage, stepped forward” (175). She feels something. Something that makes her cry, and it isn’t the pure euphoria she’s used to. And these feelings are associated with John. We’ll never know what these feelings are since he then goes on to whip her in an angered frenzy, have sex with her, and hang himself out of shame. Still, she felt something. Maybe it was something real.

Then again, maybe it wasn’t.
9:59 AM No comments
This cover shows John at the bottom, Lenina Crowne in the middle, and Mustapha Mond at the top as a looming background figure. I drew John’s skin darker than Lenina’s because I imagined that he would be tan from being outside more often than her. There’s also more sun in North America than in London, where Lenina and the other “civilized people” live. I have John in a crouching position. It is a bit primal, but that wasn’t the main point of having him in that pose. It puts him lower. Society sees him as odd and backwards. Although he is famous and receives many luxuries, he is still not part of the society that worships him. Had he remained undiscovered, the “civilized” would see him and his people as beneath them. The crouch is also feral, in a sense. To me, it seems like a potential attack position. John’s humanity and ability to feel unhappy is a focal point in the book. He is different because he does not want to be in a constant state of delirium. He is poised to strike. Out of the ordinary to the World State and yet entirely natural. The very purpose John’s character is made to serve.
Above him is Lenina. Of course, the hierarchy does dictate that she would be above him, but there’s more than that. John loves her. Is the love superficial? Absolutely, but that doesn’t matter to John. His conservative upbringing and romantic nature make him see Lenina as a higher being. He has romanticized her. Anyone who knows Lenina’s character knows that she isn’t particularly kind or caring. She’s quite stupid. John doesn’t see any of that. He just sees a beautiful woman that he wants to marry. Lenina has her arms outstretched toward the reader with her palms out. This position is supposed to show her offering herself. Not only does she do this multiple times throughout the book but, in my mind, she also represents this society attempting to sell itself to John and the reader. She is elegant, happy, and sexual, the ideals of this society, and sets her sights on John. She pursues him sexually and he repeatedly rebuffs her, much to her confusion. Still, the pleasures of this society attempt to seduce him through Lenina and he turns them both down.
 Behind them both is a large, intimidating Mustapha Mond. Mond, as he is in the book, is behind everything. His position is literally titled “World Controller”. Though he is one of ten, it’s easy to say that he is behind most of what happens in the civilized world, which is why he behind Lenina more than John. His voice is also the voice they use to indoctrinate children and subdue them as adults. He controls the entire London system with his voice. This man is the puppet master, and hopefully his position makes that obvious.
I wanted the background to be white. It took a lot of work to make it pure white. If this is in the high-tech future, surely things would be minimalist. White, clean lines, and a lack of clutter are the first things that come to mind when thinking about the future. So I decided to make the background as clean as possible.

Most book covers I’ve seen focus on the story rather than the characters. The characters are so interesting to me, though. I felt like I had to make the cover about them. The characters, to me, are the most important part of the book. It’s not a good book without good characters, and the main characters of this book are captivating. 
12:41 PM No comments
Aldous Huxley was born in Godalming, England on July 26, 1894. His family came from a long line of intellectuals. His early life was full of science, religion, and education. He and his siblings faced a tremendous amount of pressure to be perfect. This pressure may have been the cause of the suicide Aldous’ older brother Trevenan. After a blight of sickness in his mid-teens, he was left partially blind. Huxley is best known for Brave New Word, but he has written several other books, most of them satirical. His first novel, Crome Yellow, was published in 1921, five years after he graduated from Balliol College at Oxford University. After graduating, he also became a teacher in Eton and an editor on the Athenaeum, a London journal. He also worked on Vogue and Vanity Fair before focusing solely on his own novels. Brave New World left a permanent change in Huxley. His novels published after Brave New World took the idea of evil more seriously. Huxley moved from England to New Mexico, United States in 1937 with his wife Maria. Later he moved to California to correct his vision. He continued to write for the rest of his life. He died of cancer on November 22, 1963.
11:08 AM No comments
Image result for brave new world baby conditioning
I love kids. They’re adorable, funny, and lively. I love watching them and being around them. It shouldn’t be shocking to hear that any seen involving toddlers in this book got the biggest reaction out of me. The way this “advanced” society treats children is deplorable. From the Pavlovian experiments on page 13 to Linda beating her son for existing on page 85, I was upset to near tears. However, when any adult was suffering, I lacked empathy. Could it have been because most of the adults in this story have very trivial woes? Maybe. Could it have been because I disliked the character? Perhaps. When faced with the hardships of the “savages”, which were much harsher and sadder, I still felt very little sympathy for the adults. I cared more about them than the “civilized” people, but still not as much as the children. I’ve noticed this apathy for my elders for a long time. The troubles of adults often bore me. Especially the adults in this book. Most of the reader’s time has been spent with bland men or women with no self-worth. Everyone is on drugs, they live like royal cattle, and they still find the audacity to complain? Part of me hates them, particularly when I consider what they do to these kids. I find children more worthy of my compassion because I trust them more. I was the oldest sister and cousin, so I’ve spent my whole life playing with and trusting younger people. With my newest cousin, who is almost 2, I feel that that trust in children is growing. I guess I’ll have to keep myself from rolling my eyes the next time some rich Alpha complains. Who knows? Maybe I’ll have a good reason not to care next time.
5:21 PM No comments
Image result for rosebush
“Turned, the babies at once fell silent, then began to crawl towards those clusters of sleek colours, those shapes so gay and brilliant on the white pages. As they approached, the sun came out of a momentary eclipse behind a cloud. The roses flamed up as though with a sudden passion from within; a new and profound significance seemed to suffuse the shining pages of the books. From the ranks of the crawling babies came little squeals of excitement, gurgles and twitterings of pleasure” (Huxley 13). 
The reader is seeing what the babies see: bright colors, pretty shapes, and beautiful flowers. Like said babies, the reader is supposed to have good feelings about these things. They are pleasant to the eye and represent the beauty of nature. As seen in the last sentence, the babies like what they see the same way the reader does. They have infantile reactions, but the writing has served its purpose. The scene is meant to draw out similar feelings from the babies and the reader. When the sirens begin blaring and the children are given electric shocks, the reader is abhorred. I mean, the babies are more upset than the reader, but it’s still disturbing for the reader to watch. In the end, the author is trying to say that our reactions are infantile, likening the reader to babies.
8:56 AM No comments
I know, it's a tad bit late for this. However, I'd still like to get as many questions about the blog itself answered.
First off! This blog is not called "Carolina". I've actually titled it "A Thousand Worlds", which is much cooler and nicer than "Carolina". However, the title came with the template and I don't know how to get rid of it. The template is nice, though, and I've managed to work out everything else about how it looks.
The nonfiction book I'm reading is Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City by Matthew Desmond. Image result for evicted poverty and profit in the american city
Absolutely gorgeous and full of amazing tales of amazing people. It does have a lot of landlord mumbo-jumbo in it that I don't understand because I'm stubborn and refuse to Google (as seen in my first blog post).

The fiction book I'm reading is Brave New World by Aldous Huxley.
Image result for brave new world book
Love this book too, though it's a bit sad for my empathetic self. I get upset about all of the moral dilemmas, and there are a lot of moral dilemmas. I highly recommend it though!
I look forward to going through this reading adventure with you!

Emmie
4:59 PM No comments
https://coggle.it/diagram/Wo7pJxzm6QAB-6RR/t/sherrena-tarver-landlord/cd6182c47af0d3405b333e37504c4870452d08a964b14cd9ae17be274411d321

This infographic is a map of most of the major characters in the book Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City by Matthew Desmond. As mentioned in my first microblog, I often found myself confused while reading this book. There are too many character to keep up with, each with their own unique relationships and stories. Just by looking at the map, it is easy to see my dilemma. These are just the most prominent figures and their families. I should probably explain the relationships, seeing how easy it is to be lost without them. The turquoise arms connect landlord and tenant. Sherrena and Quentin Tarver are the landlords of the story, and Tobin Charey owns a trailer park. The green lines connect co-workers or characters who meet and interact through work. The purple lines represent a parent-child relationship. Poorer families tend to have more children. This was certainly the case in the book. I attempted to keep track of the various fathers, but those who were no longer with the mothers are barely mentioned, forcing me to call them “unnamed” and give what little information I can find on them. In other cases, when there is no information to be found, I simply list the child and the parent they are reported to live with, leaving the other parent off of the chart. The pink/light red lines are boyfriends/girlfriends. They can be current or former partners. In the case of Lamar Richards and the mother of his children, her relationship with Lamar is not touched upon. She is only referred to as “Luke and Eddy’s mother” and is said to have left due to her addiction (Desmond 26). Orange lines mark familial relationships. The color is not specific to any relationship and the bond is specified in the description. The deep blue lines are marriages. Like the other romantic bond, it can be a current or a former marriage. There are very few of these on the map, so I am a little surprised that I gave this relationship its own color. Finally, the yellow lines signify roommates who are not related. These only came up on one occasion, but I felt it was important to Lamar’s character. It gives insight on his kind and caring personality. I tried to give facts about the personality of the characters in the descriptions. I also tried to put more thought into the relationships that just how they were connected. There’s always more to a family than the blood. Compare the Hinkinstons to Arleen’s family. The Hinkinstons are loud, lively, and are all about making the best of what they have. They care about each other, even when they prank each other. Arleen loves her family too. While she also tries to make the best of her situation, she only interacts with two of her children in the book: Jori and Jafaris. Her other children are briefly mentioned, and two of them are not even named. She is shown to be a caring mother, but has nowhere near the amount of life in her that the mothers in the Hinkinston family have. She has seen too much loss. These families are all large, but they are all so different. I think that was one of my greatest problems with this book: keeping track of what family had what dynamic. I really wish I had had this map while I was reading.
4:09 PM 1 comments
Matthew Desmond is a Princeton sociologist and has been personally affected by poverty, the main focus of this book. Growing up, he recalls the gas being shut off sometimes and meals being cooked on a wood-burning stove instead. He had little money like his mother before him, for whom this was an improvement. When he got to college, his classmates’ and teachers’ perceptions of wealth shocked him. The concept of the American dream baffled him, and the concept of it being accessible to all was even more shocking. He worked to observe not only the root of poverty, but the people who lived in it. This story is real. Everyone in the book was personally interviewed by Desmond. He lived in Tobin’s trailer park and a house owned by Sherrena and Quentin. He paid them, too. The names shave all been changed to protect their identities, but these are all real people who Desmond now knows personally. He followed them across the country for interviews, slept in their homes, went to church with them, and watched their children. He actually talked to over a hundred people who were not featured in the book. After his time in Milwaukee, he formed the Milwaukee Area Renters Study, a survey for tenants in Milwaukee to get more accurate statistics on poverty and eviction. It ran from 2009 to 2011 and interviewed about 1,100 tenants. He has written 3 other books and several essays with focuses on race and social theory, educational inequality, dangerous work, the inner-city housing market, and political ideology. He was awarded the MacArthur “Genius” grant in 2015. 
7:43 AM No comments
While reading Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City by Matthew Desmond, I found myself lost. There is a lot of landlord jargon and even more characters. The jargon was not my top priority, so I typically glossed over the more technical terms and skipped over to the statistics. What I cared about were the characters. I love all their stories. They were tragic and many of the characters recalled being at the lowest of lows. Despite their current condition, these families continue to find hope and happiness in their lives and each other. I adore them. The only problem is how many stories there are to keep track of. There are the main landlords, the tenants, the people from the tenants’ past, and the tenants’ families. Many times I could not recognize names. Initially, I opted to ignore the confusion and assume this was a new character. I later came to realize that this was not a good idea and caught myself when a foreign name appeared. I searched up a few character maps. None of them were very detailed or descriptive, but they helped me get back on track. As for paying attention to the landlord jargon, that still is not a main concern of mine. I can recognize a few terms now. SSI, a monthly payment for the elderly, blind, or disabled, is so commonly referenced that I have to recognize it at this point. I rarely look up term definitions. Whether this is out of apathy or stubbornness, I have no idea. This book made me realize how little I look for outside help. I only looked for character maps when I was drowning in names. I still have not looked up any definitions for landowner phrases. Personally, I am not a fan of law systems and so on, and this book has more of that than I ever expected to learn in my lifetime. I care more about the family stories than those surrounding the court. In the end, however, I know I will turn to research when it is impossible to avoid.
4:16 PM No comments
Newer Posts

About me

Image result for book aesthetic


Just a kid trying to rekindle the spirit of reading.
___________________________
This blog is not called Carolina I swear

recent posts

Labels

Fiction macroblog microblog nonfiction

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2018 (15)
    • ▼  March (10)
      • Newspaper Article
      • Antagonists in Evicted
      • Vanetta Evans
      • Children are the Future
      • Thoughts on my Evicted Reading Habits
      • Brave New World Crossword Puzzle
      • How I Feel About Lenina Crowne
      • Revised Cover for Brave New World
      • Research on Aldous Huxley
      • Brave New World Metacognition
    • ►  February (5)
      • Imagery in Brave New World
      • A Few Notes on This Website
      • Infographic: The Relationships Between the Main Ch...
      • Research on Matthew Desmond
      • Evicted Metacognition

Created with by ThemeXpose | Distributed By Gooyaabi Templates